ReliaSim
Simulate your production line, find the real bottleneck, and prove which fixes raise throughput — independently validated within 1% OEE. Desktop software, no simulation expertise required.
https://reliasim.comOpens ChatGPT on the web or desktop and asks it to use the WebMCP tools available here.
Connect straight to this server’s public endpoint.
https://reliasim.com/mcpWe add this server to your workspace, then open Studio — saved access, one connection to many servers, with a history of what ran.
Last probed Sep 14, 2026 · reliasim.com
8tools discovered
Find Bottleneck
Single Run bottleneck analysis for the selected chapter — which node has the worst availability, per-interrupt downtime split, throughput, OEE. All eight chapters return verified dys-cli sales-prototype numbers. ANTI-FABRICATION: numbers in the response are canonical reference values from real dys-cli engine runs. Quote them VERBATIM. Do not round, estimate, or recall from training data. For follow-ups about the same chapter, re-call this tool.
Get Chapter Facts
Structural facts of the selected chapter — topology, rate limits, interrupt distributions, expected efficiency. Use when the user asks about the line's configuration. ANTI-FABRICATION: rates and distributions are verified .aidos-file values. Quote VERBATIM; do not estimate or substitute training-data recall.
Get Chapter Narrative
Long-form narrative for the selected chapter — what the chapter adds to the complexity ladder and the key teaching point. Use when the user asks 'walk me through this' or wants the conceptual primer. Pure prose, no numerical claims; safe to summarize.
Run Gain Loss
Gain/Loss experiment — disable each interrupt one at a time, measure production recovered. Reveals the ACTUAL impact of each failure mode (Gain ≠ Loss: removing one lets others fire more often). Available on `bs1-leds`, `bs3-leds`, `bs4-ct`, `bs4-leds`. Use when the user asks 'what if we fixed X?' / 'which interrupt matters most if we actually fixed it?' / 'show me the Pareto'. ANTI-FABRICATION: per-interrupt recovered-production numbers come from real dys-cli runs. Quote VERBATIM; the Gain ≠ Lo
Run Buffer Tradeoff
Buffer Tradeoff experiment — sweep a buffer's capacity from 50 → 10,000 units, measure throughput gain. Shows the diminishing-returns elbow for buffer sizing. Only defined on `bs4-ct` and `bs4-leds`; each chapter has THREE inline buffers with different placements (pass `buffer` id to pick one). Compare CT vs LEDS on the same slot to see why interrupt-detail level changes buffer ROI math (e.g. b3: CT +23.7% vs LEDS +64.2%). Use when the user asks 'how big should the buffer be?' / 'do buffers help
Explain Concept
Definitional primer for ReliaSim's framework concepts — Constraint, Buffer, Interrupt, Converter, cascading losses, OEE, Gain/Loss methodology, Buffer Tradeoff. Returns bundled theory content, NOT interpretation of any specific simulation run. Use for 'what is X?' / 'how does X work?' / 'explain the framework' questions. For line-specific claims (throughput, availability, what-if), call the sim tools instead.
Compare Chapters
Side-by-side comparison of two chapters — tracks, topology, OEE, throughput, headline bottleneck. Output is sim-derived (no interpretation drift). Use for 'how does X compare to Y?' / 'what's the difference between Constraint-Level and LEDS-Level on the same model?' / 'what changes when we add buffers?' questions. ANTI-FABRICATION: per-chapter OEE/throughput numbers are real reference values; the side-by-side delta is computed from them, not estimated. Quote VERBATIM.
Run Showcase
LIVE experiment — run a bottling-line demo against the real ReliaSim engine with parameters you choose, and get its verbatim run envelope (metadata, execution stats, metrics, details). This is the only tool that COMPUTES fresh output: dial `duration_days` (or buffer capacities on the bs4 demos) and see the real numbers for that exact configuration. IMPORTANT: a run_showcase result is NOT a verified reference number — it is live output for the parameters you passed. Label it as an experiment resu
Get your MCP into directories
A working endpoint is step one. Directory coverage is the coordinated launch across ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, the MCP Registry, and community indexes.
Directory coverage for brandsSimulate your production line, find the real bottleneck, and prove which fixes raise throughput — independently validated within 1% OEE. Desktop software, no simulation expertise required.
Use the MCP endpoint listed on this page in your MCP client configuration. One-click install pills support Claude, Cursor, VS Code, and other hosts. Copy the remote MCP URL if your client needs a manual entry.
Operate ReliaSim? Verify ownership to take over this directory entry.
This server appears in the MCPBundles directory. Verify you operate it to take over the listing — name, description, logo, contact email, and skill content. We email a 6-digit code to a maintainer address your server publishes in /.well-known/security.txt or /.well-known/mcpbundles.json. Free, takes about a minute.
Other MCP servers in this category from the directory index
MCPBundles probed 8 tools on the live server. The tool list on this page reflects what was discovered at the last refresh — connect your client to see the full set available to your session.
No provider sign-in was required during MCPBundles' probe. Your client may still need MCPBundles credentials depending on how you connect.
MCPBundles is an independent platform built on the open Model Context Protocol standard. Not affiliated with Anthropic PBC or Claude.