Run Value-First Reddit Research with the MCP Reddit Bundle
Here's the exact playbook for using our Reddit bundle to find winning ad teardowns, copy their structure, and write your own "here’s what actually worked" breakdowns.
Most people stare at a blank page wondering what to write. We're going to skip that part entirely. Instead, we'll use the Reddit bundle to find what's already working, understand why it works, and then just plug in our own data.
You can run all of this right now in Bundle Studio.

1. Connect Once
Just open Bundle Studio, add the Reddit bundle, and hit approve. That's it.
Note: We already handled the permissions in the config, so you don't need to mess with any setup. It's read-only by default for these kinds of searches, so it's safe and fast.
2. Run Natural Language Queries
Don't overthink the commands. The whole point of MCP is that you can talk like a human.
Step A: Dig up the good stuff in r/PPC
We're looking for "high effort" posts. The keywords below—"analyzed," "results," "audited"—filter out the lazy questions and help you find the people doing real work.
Ask the agent:
Find the top posts in r/PPC from the past year that say things like:
- "analyzed"
- "here’s how"
- "results inside"
- "audited"
Give me the titles, scores, and permalinks.
Step B: Break it down
Once you have the list, don't just read them. Analyze the structure. You want to know how they hooked the reader.
Ask the agent:
For the best ones, pull the full post text and summarize the structure:
1. Opener (how did they establish authority?)
2. Section headers (how did they organize the value?)
3. The final Call to Action (what did they ask for?)
Step C: Do it again for Facebook
Different audience, same principle. In r/FacebookAds, contrarian takes often do better.
Run this:
Find top posts in r/FacebookAds with keywords:
- "analyzed"
- "here’s what"
- "stop trusting"
- "actually"
- "wrong about"
3. Inspect Real Examples
I did some digging to get you started. Here are a few threads that are actually worth your time. Notice a pattern? They all promise specific, hard-won data.
🎯 From r/PPC
- Insights from 31 Google Ads accounts audited — The specific number "31" builds instant trust.
- Google's 2025 PMax Updates: Are They Actually Fixing Anything? — Taps into shared frustration.
- I tested Google AI Max's keyword matching — Implies "I did the work so you don't have to."
- Finally figured out why my ads were bleeding money for 2 years — Vulnerable and relatable.
📘 From r/FacebookAds
- I analyzed 20,000+ top-performing ad creatives — Massive scale = massive authority.
- I Spend $400K/mo on Meta and It's Never Been Easier. Here's How. — High spend proves competence.
- I Was Wrong About 3:2:2 — Meta's Andromeda Update Changed Everything — Admitting a mistake is a powerful hook.
- Top 10 Most Valuable Things I Learned About Meta Ads In 2024 — Classic listicle, but effective.
4. Turn It Into Your Post
Now, steal the format. Don't reinvent the wheel. Just take what works and plug in your own numbers.
-
The Hook: Start with the volume.
- "Audited 31 accounts"
- "Managed $400K/mo spend"
- "Analyzed 20,000 creatives"
- Why: This proves you aren't just guessing. You have data.
-
The Meat: 3–5 lessons. Keep it crisp.
- Use bold headers.
- Keep paragraphs short.
- Focus on "what to do" vs "theory."
-
The Twist: Admit you were wrong about something.
- People are skeptical of "gurus" who know everything.
- Saying "I thought X, but data showed Y" builds massive credibility.
-
The Proof: One chart. One screenshot.
- That's all you need. Just one visual to prove you're not making it up.
-
The Close: Finish with one line.
- "If you want the script/template I used, DM me."
- Why: This is the "DM Magnet." It starts a conversation instead of just broadcasting.
Why this works: You aren't "creating content." You're sharing value. That closing line is what gets people to reply, but the value is what earns you the right to ask. The bundle just gives you the blueprint to find that value faster.